Screen
Research tool · not investment advice. Full disclaimer →
Screen
build a shortlist, share it as a linkSource: computed from NSE prices · accumulation · CPR · credibility.
A shortlist to study and never a buy list: liquid stocks ranked by how many independent pillars — momentum, accumulation, relative strength, structure — line up right now, each turned into a shape beside its raw numbers. Sort any column, filter it, and the URL becomes the screen you saved.
| Symbol | Sector? | Price (₹)? | ★ Triple confirm? | Quality score? | Quality tier? | C score? | C tier? | Credibility? | Credibility tier? | Credibility trend? | Credibility forward | Deterioration? | Veto? | Concalls | Strength percentile of 1,448? | Strength vs sector? | Character? | Deliv %? | Instrument | Rank in screen | vs own 1-mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20MICRONS | — | 207.3 | — | 52 | T3 | 59 | GOOD | 30 | D | DETERIORATING | Down | 6 | — | 3 | 69 | — | Consolidation | 46.1% | — | 0.6× | |
| 360ONE | Nifty Financial Services | 1,040.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 55 | B | DETERIORATING | Down | 3 | — | 21 | 47 | Uptrend | Neutral | 60.4% | — | 1.1× | |
| 3BBLACKBIO | — | 1,646.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 90 | — | Neutral | 34.4% | — | 1.3× | |
| 3MINDIA | — | 30,795.0 | — | 59 | T3 | 81 | EXCELLENT | 44 | C | STABLE | Up | 0 | — | 1 | 33 | — | Neutral | 45.3% | — | 1.1× | |
| 5PAISA | — | 316.4 | — | 54 | T3 | 47 | AVERAGE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31 | — | Neutral | 45.0% | — | 2.4× | |
| 63MOONS | — | 802.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 86 | — | Neutral | 38.3% | — | 0.4× | |
| AADHARHFC | Nifty Financial Services | 448.4 | — | 35 | DISQUALIFIED | — | — | 56 | B | DETERIORATING | Down | 4 | — | 3 | 22 | Downtrend | Neutral | 47.9% | — | 1.7× | |
| AARTIDRUGS | Nifty Healthcare Index | 421.0 | — | 37 | T4 | 46 | AVERAGE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 67 | Uptrend | Neutral | 48.5% | — | 0.8× | |
| AARTIIND | Nifty Chemicals | 465.1 | — | 24 | T4 | 32 | WEAK | 74 | A | STABLE | Up | 0 | — | 3 | 51 | Uptrend | Consolidation | 50.7% | — | 0.8× | |
| AARTIPHARM | Nifty Healthcare Index | 968.5 | — | 36 | T4 | 35 | WEAK | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 89 | Breakout | Neutral | 41.6% | — | 0.9× | |
| AAVAS | Nifty Financial Services | 1,190.9 | — | 32 | DISQUALIFIED | 41 | WEAK | 43 | C | DETERIORATING | Down | 6 | — | 6 | 21 | Downtrend | Distribution | 72.3% | — | 2.6× | |
| ABB | Nifty Energy | 6,900.0 | — | 63 | T3 | 80 | EXCELLENT | 36 | D | DETERIORATING | Down | 5 | — | 31 | 54 | Uptrend | Consolidation | 39.1% | — | 1.3× | |
| ABBOTINDIA | Nifty Healthcare Index | 26,840.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 52 | Consolidating | Consolidation | 55.4% | — | 0.8× | |
| ABCAPITAL | Nifty Financial Services | 375.1 | — | 48 | DISQUALIFIED | — | — | 94 | A+ | STABLE | Up | 0 | — | 7 | 55 | Uptrend | Neutral | 66.0% | — | 1.8× | |
| ABDL | Nifty FMCG | 679.5 | — | — | — | — | — | 55 | B | DETERIORATING | Down | 3 | — | 3 | 79 | Uptrend | Distribution | 57.0% | — | 1.0× | |
| ABFRL | — | 44.5 | — | — | — | — | — | 55 | B | DETERIORATING | Down | 2 | — | 3 | 3 | — | Neutral | 44.3% | — | 1.0× | |
| ABLBL | — | 74.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 78 | A | DETERIORATING | Down | 3 | — | 3 | 4 | — | Neutral | 56.3% | — | 0.7× | |
| ABREL | Nifty Realty | 1,100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | Downtrend | Neutral | 52.6% | — | 2.2× | |
| ABSLAMC | Nifty Financial Services | 991.7 | — | 47 | T3 | — | — | 55 | B | STABLE | Up | 0 | — | 1 | 32 | Consolidating | Neutral | 34.9% | — | 1.2× | |
| ACC | — | 1,182.8 | — | 58 | T3 | 64 | GOOD | 5 | D | DETERIORATING | Down | 5 | — | 3 | 16 | — | Neutral | 49.7% | — | 1.0× | |
| ACCELYA | — | 1,094.2 | — | 52 | T3 | 87 | EXCELLENT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40 | — | Consolidation | 60.0% | — | 6.9× | |
| ACE | — | 1,212.3 | — | 66 | T3 | 76 | EXCELLENT | 41 | C | DETERIORATING | Down | 5 | — | 5 | 83 | — | Neutral | 36.6% | — | 1.4× | |
| ACI | — | 475.1 | — | 34 | DISQUALIFIED | 18 | POOR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | — | Neutral | 49.8% | — | 0.4× | |
| ACMESOLAR | — | 432.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 82 | — | Neutral | 30.7% | — | 0.4× | |
| ACUTAAS | Nifty Healthcare Index | 3,196.5 | — | 60 | T3 | 73 | EXCELLENT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 64 | Consolidating | Neutral | 51.0% | — | 1.1× |
Each row is one liquid stock on the latest exchange close. Every value is a stored, precomputed number — nothing is recomputed or predicted on the fly.
How to read this screen
plain EnglishSource: Patearn glossary.
How to read this screen SCREENscope · views · columns · the URL
Pick a scope (an index, your watchlist, everything liquid, or a theme), then a view — a named set of columns for one question. Add or drop whole column families, sort on any column, and narrow with the filter box. Nothing is hidden behind a plan: every column, filter and export is free.
Numeric cuts. Any number column can also be cut to a threshold, straight from the address bar: ?f=su1:gte:3 keeps only rows whose Surge 1m is 3 or more, and ?f=su1:gte:3,dlv:gte:60 asks for both at once (gte = at least, lte = at most; up to six cuts). Each active cut appears as a chip you can click to remove. A name whose value for that column is unknown is left OUT — a cut lists the names that met it, never the names nobody measured.
The Confluence column counts how many independent pillars line up on a name today (delivery positioning · accumulation · relative strength · structure · credibility · geometry). It is a way to sort a shortlist, not a score to act on — the pillars were built and tested separately, and several of them are explicitly descriptive-only.
The address bar is the saved screen. Every choice you make is in the URL, so you can bookmark it, share it, or paste it to a colleague and they see exactly your screen. The CSV button downloads that same screen — same scope, same filter, same sort, same columns.
Only liquid names are shown: a stock must trade at or above the 30th percentile of the day's exchange turnover. That floor re-derives from the data every day rather than sitting at a fixed rupee number. How many names it removed is printed beside the count above — and if the floor could not be derived on this host, that line says the fence is not in force rather than repeating this paragraph.
Quality (14-pattern) — Descriptive only — the 14-pattern composite is falsified as an attribution: 121 of its 291 weight units are hard-coded constants and four of the fourteen patterns are additive constants that never vary. It describes durability; it never ranks and never triggers. Graded on exchange filings for non-lenders; the tests the filings cannot answer yet count as not assessed, and a lender is not graded.
Capital allocation — Graded on exchange filings. Descriptive context or a blend tilt — never a veto and never a standalone ranker.
Credibility — Descriptive only — the credibility composite FAILED its leak-free predictive gate (Gate B). It is context about disclosure quality, never a rank.
Themes and baskets are a different door onto the same data — browse by what companies actually do →