Review inbox
The human-verification layer — everything the machine proposes waits here for a person's verdict · descriptive, not advice
Bottom lineNothing the machine produces counts until a person has approved it here. This page is that gate, and the record of every call made at it — which is what turns “a human checks it” into a number you can audit.
57waiting on you
301decisions recorded
6decided here
How often the machine is right
| Queue | Pending | Decided here | Agreement rate | Imported | Imported rate |
|---|
| Event briefs | 0 | 2 | 50% | 0 | n/a |
| Rule-lab verdicts | 0 | 1 | 100% | 0 | n/a |
| Theme tags | 57 | 3 | 33% | 295 | 94% |
In plain EnglishWhy two rates, not one. “Decided here” counts verdicts given since the inbox went live — that is the clean measure of how often a proposer is right. “Imported” is the history that existed before it: the old storage recorded an approved proposal and a hand-added tag as the same row, so those two acts cannot be told apart and the imported rate flatters the proposers. They are shown side by side rather than blended into one number. Agreement rate → What this is
Everything the machine proposes — a theme label for a company, an AI-drafted note on a results event — lands in one queue and waits for a person to approve or reject it. Nothing counts until it has been checked. A rejected proposal is not just dropped: it leaves a marker so the same suggestion is never made twice.
Every decision is kept. That record is what makes the claim measurable rather than rhetorical: the agreement rates above are how often each generator turned out to be right, counted from real verdicts — including the times it was wrong.
The queue itself is private — it holds drafts that have not been checked yet, and an unchecked draft is exactly what must not be published. Owner? Unlock →