Skip to content
✎ FeedbackNew here?

The UNION FAMILY LADDER — every configuration IN FULL (specs + all recorded numbers)

One-line definition: the Union Ladder is the full-record compendium of every union-family configuration — sealed, recorded, and rejected alike — with each member's complete ruleset and every recorded result number standing in one place, so the whole family can be read side by side without chasing deltas across ledger entries.

Shared machinery (every member, verbatim across the family): NSE bhavcopy EQ+BE+BZ, corporate-action adjusted (the adjust code), split-ratio quarantine (the quarantine code), PIT sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation to the 16 NSE sector indices (yearly refresh), UNION signals — TREND: price-RSI(14) > its 50-SMA AND ≥70% trailing-quarter consistency vs own sector· TURN "6b": RSI(14)-of-RS < 30 → ≥ 30 in trailing ~60d — quarterly rebalance (first trading day Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct), trailing stop −20% from peak close @1% slip, 0.15%/side costs, dead names −50%, same-close convention (-F1 next-day variant = the standing honesty check), benchmark Nifty Next 50 buy-and-hold PR (TRI recut owed), beta/alpha vs Nifty 500 quarterly. Dividend accrual (TR rows) = parsed ₹-per-share ex-date credits at raw-price denominators — a LOWER BOUND (97.7% coverage 2012+, ~34% before).


1. 🔒 THE UNION — seal a9a14058… (the union prereg notes; ledger 16U→X)

Distinct rules: universe floor ABSOLUTE ₹5cr prior-month ADV· no beta cap· engine-order top-60 (documented-rank corrected 16Z)· equal-weight 1/60· idle → Next-50 while Nifty 500 ≥ 200DMA else 0% cash.

windowCAGRMaxDD₹1Cr→βαinv
FULL 2006-26 PR17.5%−30.5%26.04×0.87+6.8%82%
FULL TR18.1%−29.3%29.19×0.87+7.4%
2006-1119.0%−27.9%2.60×0.77+9.8%67%
2012-1716.5%−16.2%2.32×1.42−4.6%80%
2018-2618.1%−22.9%3.95×0.91+8.3%96%

2. 🔒 UNION-β14 — seal 08b46199… (the union beta14 prereg notes; ledger 16Y)

Distinct rules: union + EXCLUDE qualifiers with trailing-250d beta vs Nifty 500 > 1.4 (min 150 obs; incomputable kept). Engine-order top-60, EW, sleeve200, 0% cash.

windowCAGRMaxDD₹1Cr→βαinv
FULL PR18.1%−24.7%28.84×0.74+8.4%69%
FULL TR18.7%−24.1%32.39×0.74+9.0%
2006-1117.4%−23.0%2.42×0.67+9.3%53%
2012-1719.1%−8.3%2.62×1.03+3.4%58%
2018-2618.8%−15.7%4.14×0.82+9.2%90%
FULL @2% slip17.0%−25.8%24.09×0.75+7.4%

Kill-checks recorded (16Y): cap plateau 1.3–1.6 all-positive; beta-window 125/500d robust; dead-cash decomposition proves selection-not-sleeve (2012-17 −5.6% → +1.7% with idle at 0%); 29.0% of qualifier-quarters genuinely excluded, 0.38% kept-missing.

3. 🔒 UNION-C40RA — seal 0715a0d9… (the union c40ra prereg notes; ledger 16AB)

Distinct rules: β14 + rank capped qualifiers by RISKADJ (126d return ÷ 63d vol, min 30 obs; incomputable last) + hold TOP-40 (EW 1/40). Sleeve200, 0% cash.

windowCAGRMaxDD₹1Cr→βαinv
FULL PR21.0%−28.4%47.29×0.81+10.3%84%
FULL TR21.8%−27.5%54.29×0.82+11.0%
2006-1117.9%−25.1%2.47×0.79+9.2%73%
2012-1720.9%−8.3%2.84×1.04+4.3%78%
2018-2624.6%−18.3%6.15×0.81+14.3%97%
FULL @2% slip19.7%−29.8%38.34×0.83+9.2%
FULL next-day (-F1)20.0%−28.5%39.86×0.82+9.5%
worst-honest (lagged+2%+TR)19.5%−29.0%37.15×0.83+9.1%
2017+ slice (16AG table)30.1%−17.9%11.37×0.85+16.4%100%

4. 📋 A1-COMPOSITE (era-floor RAW + rf-cash) — recorded 16AE, unregistered

Distinct rules: C40RA + era-relative floor RAW (monthly (1−P)-quantile of the ADV cross-section, P = 0.450 frozen; NO clamp) + idle in the bear state earns rf (Nifty 1D Rate Index 2016-06-23+, flat 6.5%/yr before — the attribution code convention). Top-40 EW.

windowCAGRMaxDD₹1Cr→βαinv
FULL PR25.6%−32.0%100.43×0.82+14.5%99%
FULL TR26.4%−32.0%114.91×0.82+15.2%
2006-1120.2%−32.0%2.75×0.69+11.3%98%
2012-1731.6%−13.7%4.53×1.49+5.2%100%
2018-2627.5%−17.9%7.44×0.80+17.5%100%
@2% slip24.0%−34.4%77.58×0.83+13.1%
@3% slip22.4%−36.7%59.85×0.84+11.6%
next-day24.7%−34.8%87.25×0.82+13.8%
worst-honest24.0%−37.1%77.35×0.83+13.1%

⚠ Dominated by A2 (equal CAGR, 3–6pp worse MaxDD, half the tail ADV, 2012-17 realized β 1.49 vs 1.29; 2013 floor dips to ₹0.37cr — cost model not credible at that tail). Kept for the record.

5. 📋 A2-COMPOSITE (era-floor CLAMPED + rf-cash) — recorded 16AE; **the lower-drawdown

alternative, registration-ready on the desk's word**

Distinct rules: as A1 but floor = max(₹1cr, monthly (1−P)-quantile), P = 0.450 frozen. Top-40 EW, rf-earning bear-cash.

windowCAGRMaxDD₹1Cr→βαinv
FULL PR25.5%−27.2%99.03×0.82+14.2%97%
FULL TR26.3% ( measured, 16AO)−27.2%113.65×0.82+14.9%
2006-1122.2%−27.2%3.01×0.73+12.8%93%
2012-1728.6%−13.7%4.00×1.29+5.4%97%
2018-2627.4%−17.9%7.37×0.82+17.1%100%
@2% slip23.9%−29.3%77.21×0.83+12.8%
@3% slip22.4%−31.4%60.12×0.84+11.5%
next-day24.6%−29.4%85.40×0.82+13.6%
worst-honest23.9%−31.5%76.53×0.83+12.9%

Median pick-ADV ₹7.7–11.3cr (early/mid windows) vs C40RA's ₹27cr — the character change (16AE): small/mid-cap tilt, personal-scale capital only. Its 2017+ slice = the 30.1% PR row in §3 (same machinery on that window).

6. 🔒 COMPOSITE-30 — THE CONFIRMED LEAD (the desk 2026-07-16), seal in

the union composite30 prereg notes (ledger 16AF/16AH)

Distinct rules: A2-composite + hold TOP-30 + LET-WINNERS-RUN weights (retained names keep market-drifted weight, hard cap 5% of book; entrants 1/30 from freed/idle capital; exit on deselection/stop/death). Everything else per the shared machinery + A2 floor + rf-cash.

windowCAGRMaxDD₹1Cr→βαinv
FULL PR26.4%−31.7%115.69×0.82+15.1%99%
FULL TR27.3%−31.6%131.80×0.82+15.8%
2006-1124.7%−31.7%3.36×0.73+14.6%97%
2012-1729.2% (TR 30.5%)−13.1%4.10×1.32+5.8%99%
2018-2628.0% (TR 28.9%)−18.1%7.69×0.78+18.2%100%
@2% slip24.8%−33.8%89.19×0.83+13.7%
@3% slip23.2%−35.9%68.65×0.84+12.2%
next-day25.2%−34.1%94.84×0.81+14.2%
worst-honest24.4%−36.3%83.50×0.83+13.5%

Component single-axis rows (16AF, on the A2-composite base): top-30 alone 25.9%/α+14.6· let-winners-run alone 26.5%/α+15.1/DD −27.3· rank-weights alone 26.3%/α+15.1/β0.79 (passed; not composed — drift took the declared precedence).

6b. 🔒 THE R-IMPROVEMENT SIBLINGS — the HOLD / DEEP variants (2026-07-22; ledger 16BD/16BE/16BF)

Three sealed variants from the "lift CAGR / cut drawdown" research pass, each = an existing base + one or two orthogonal, individually robustness-swept levers. Unlike §1–§6 (whose tables are FLAT/seal-basis), these are measured on the identical Zerodha real-cost gauntlet (ledger 16BC), so their NET numbers are comparable to each other. Forward-tested 2026-10-03+ beside the four originals; family adjudication picks ≤1 across ALL sealed specs (these share levers/base with K30/A2, disclosed in their preregs, so a joint pass ≠ separate discoveries).

The two levers:

siblingseal= base + lever(s)flat CAGRNET (gauntlet)₹1cr → networst drop
_(COMPOSITE-30 baseline)_07ef2ef9…—26.4%+17.8%₹27.6cr−38%
K30-HOLDe6994c19…COMPOSITE-30 + HOLD (top-60)27.2%+19.0%₹33.6cr−38%
A2-HOLD17e0dd1a…A2 (EW top-40) + HOLD (top-80)26.6%+18.6%₹31.5cr−33%
K30-DEEP-HOLDb705f770…COMPOSITE-30 + DEEP + HOLD27.5%+19.2%₹34.8cr−29%

Read: K30-DEEP-HOLD is the best net (19.2%) AND the lowest drawdown (−29%) of the whole family — the stack keeps the HOLD return-boost and the DEEP drawdown-cut. A2-HOLD is the lower-drawdown equal-weight cousin (its net is mildly OPTIMISTIC — equal-weight under-charges reweight drift under the gauntlet, 16BC). ⚠ all IN-SAMPLE, and net-of-cost ≠ net-of-selection; K30-DEEP-HOLD carries the HIGHEST overfit risk of the seven (two stacked in-sample levers) — disclosed in its prereg. Per-window breakdowns not separately run (the gauntlet is full-period). Preregs: the union k30 hold prereg notes· the union a2 hold prereg notes· the union k30 deephold prereg notes. All seven siblings now grade mechanically in the union forward code on 2026-10-03+ (ledger 16BG).

7. ❌ The walls (full detail in catalog §G + the ledger)

Sector caps· RSI-rank both ways· beta-rank-asc· 6b threshold/combo/timeframe variants· quality tilt/drop (16Z)· ML Ridge-primary (16AA: 20.4 vs control 20.8 on 2017+)· ML GBM-primary over the era-floor pool (16AG: 21.1 vs the RISKADJ hand rule's 30.1 on 2017+; beta #1 feature all three runs)· trail widths ≠ 20· sleeve-index swaps· cap-floor refill· vs-bench consistency· monthly cadence (4× confirmed)· cross-family LOWVOL_MOM blend, corr 0.83 (16AC)· throttle (16W)· inverse-vol sizing (16X — narrowed by 16AF to VOL-based sizing only)· AND-intersection (16V)· BE/fundamentals vetoes (16T).

8. Measurement estate — TRI RECUT COMPLETE (ledger 16AI/16AJ)

The honest hurdle: Nifty Next 50 TRI = 14.6%/yr full-period (11.3 / 25.1 / 11.5 by window), +1.3pp over the PR bar. Data: the niftyindices hist code (the committed fetch tool; pipeline verified to the paisa vs index_rows) → the niftyindices folder on the box: N500 TRI + NN50 TRI full 2005→2026, GS-10Yr 2011+, GS-Composite 2018+. α vs Nifty 500 TRI (betas unchanged): union +5.8· β14 +7.5· C40RA +9.4· A1c +13.5· A2c +13.3· COMPOSITE-30 +14.2 (book-TR pairing +14.8, windows +14.0/+5.0/+18.0) — every member survives the honest recut; full table in ledger 16AJ. B2 G-sec bear-sleeve: INERT on the lead (idle ~1%) and DATA-BOUNDED on the union (the 2008-09 bear predates the 2011+ G-sec series) — a design option for future bears, no backtest evidence, not adopted. rf convention frozen (1D-Rate + 6.5% proxy). Dividend accrual = lower bound. Median pick-ADV (/16AO, full-period / recent-4-rebalances, ₹cr): U 24.4/31.7· B14 23.4/45.4· C40 27.0/58.7· A1 8.7/52.1· A2 11.3/52.1· K30 12.7/57.7 — the era-floor books' small/mid-cap tilt is an EARLY/MID-ERA phenomenon; current selections are ₹52–58cr liquid. A2's clean-TR is measured: 26.3% (§5 table). Sealed criteria stay PR-vs-PR as frozen; the TRI columns are reported beside every future judgment. Forward-test day (2026-10-03+) is ONE COMMAND — the union forward code (box-verified 2026-07-17: repro 6/6 to the digit; boundary leg 2026-07-01→~2026-10-01 derived from data; criteria sections self-suppress at 0 forward quarters): reproduction gate on all SIX configs (the five 16AL-gated rows hard-STOP on any miss; A1 soft-flagged), then the forward window per the preregs' own boundary ("every NEW quarter from 2026-07"; strict post-seal cut printed beside), the four frozen criteria per sealed member (INTERIM until ≥ 8 quarters, then mechanical family adjudication — highest forward alpha among passers), the once-owed median-pick-ADV + A2-clean-TR prints, and the 16AN portfolio dial (the portfolio layer design notes). Prod index_rows ingestion: DONE (ledger 16AK) — 'Nifty 500 TRI' / 'Nifty Next 50 TRI' / 'Nifty GS 10Yr' / 'Nifty GS Compsite' live in prod, manifest entry indexes_tri, pull-on-demand freshness via the committed tool.

9. THE SEALED VALIDATION (ledger 16AL; protocol 37c28824… run as frozen)

Reproduction gate 5/5 to the digit. C1 (paired block bootstrap, 81 quarters): the decisive C40→K30 increment is REAL (+5.27pp, 95% CI [+0.54, +9.90], p=0.014); the full U→K30 climb +8.87pp (p=0.002); the β-cap and A2→K30 rungs are individually within noise (recorded). C2a: α>0 in 7/7 rolling 3y windows for B14/A2/K30. C2b (TRAIN ≤2018 → TEST 2019+ once): survival 1.01 — supports the seals — but the ERA-FLOOR rung fails the ≤2018 re-derivation (P_train=0.268): the family's highest window-fit-risk rung, first suspect if forward data disappoints. C4: drift contribution not regime-concentrated (+1.2/−0.2/+0.6). C5: dead-name haircut to −90% costs only −1.6/−1.8pp — no artifact.

DEFLATED FORWARD-CAGR EXPECTATIONS (Bailey-LdP, N_trials=69 — quote these beside every headline): U 15.7%· β14 16.6%· C40RA 18.1%· A2-composite 21.0%· COMPOSITE-30 21.6%. The in-sample headlines above are selection-inflated by construction; these bands are the honest forward expectation until 2026-10-03 speaks.

PBO/CSCV (ledger 16AM): PBO = 0.043 — LOW overfit risk over the full 31-config searched matrix (70 combinatorial splits); K30's OOS rank mean 0.938 / min 0.767. With this, the robustness suite is complete: paired significance ✓· interim OOS ✓· deflation ✓· stress ✓· PBO ✓ — one recorded soft spot (the era-floor rung's ≤2018 re-derivation failure).

Independent cross-check (2026-07-17, ledger cross-check of 16AL): C1/C2/C3 were re-run by a SECOND harness that shares no engine code with the runner (the union ladder c1 code + the union ladder c23 code, which exec-load the sealed engine byte-for-byte). Every result reproduced to the digit/3dp — the C40→K30 gate PASS, the A2→K30 and β-cap nulls, P_train=0.268, the 2019+ slices, and the Deflated-Sharpe values (0.898…0.998). The validation is not an implementation artifact.


10. FUNDABILITY BOARD — the web twin (S-UNION-VARIANTS, 2026-08-27, D-PENDING)

Why this section exists. Until this session the variants above were readable only by someone who already knew to open this compendium or the Tier-C block on /dash/model-portfolios. In the strategies area — where a reader goes to ask "what strategies do you have?" — the library carried ONE union row, so eight of the nine configurations, and both falsified ML rankers, were effectively kept aside. the desk (2026-08-27): "They should exist visibly as upcoming / under-review / not-yet-fundable variants."

They are now listed as declared UPCOMING entries in the Strategy library (/dash/home/strategies/library), rendered by the union upcoming code. This section is the doc-side twin of that board and its maintenance anchor: the module transcribes its numbers from §§1–6b above, and an automated test fails if a row cites a section that is not in this file.

The verdict, stated once

No union variant is fundable today, and the reason is identical for all of them: every headline is in-sample, not one has a single CLOSED forward quarter, and capacity is UNVERIFIED at every size. The 2026-10-03 forward verdict is the first moment any of them can produce evidence rather than a lead — and the family's frozen rule graduates at most ONE among any that pass. This is a MEASURED verdict, not a default posture: it would be reversed by forward evidence recorded in the ledger, by nothing else.

VariantFundabilityBlocking item(s)
The Union· β14· C40RA· COMPOSITE-30· K30-HOLD· A2-HOLD· K30-DEEP-HOLD⏳ not fundable — under reviewthe 2026-10-03 forward verdict· family adjudication (≤1 graduates)· capacity study
A2-COMPOSITE⏳ not fundable — under reviewnever registered (registration-ready on the desk's word)· then the above
A1-COMPOSITE⏳ not fundable — kept for the recorddominated by A2 on every axis (§4); not a graduation candidate
Union-ML (Ridge, 16AA)· Union-ML v2 (GBM, 16AG)❌ rejectednone — CLOSED. Any future ML attempt is a NEW pre-registration, never a revival

Gross vs net — three columns, never blended

The board publishes three separately-labelled return columns because this estate's standing failure mode is a gross headline read as a fundable return (the strategy ledger BLOCKING FAILURE MODELS; PACER-25's 35.6% gross → −1.4% net is the house example):

ColumnBasisCoverage
Gross (flat cost)the seal-basis model — 0.15%/side, 1% stop slipevery recorded variant (§§1–6b)
Net (real cost)the Zerodha real-cost gauntlet, ledger 16BCfour rows only — COMPOSITE-30 and the three §6b siblings. Every other row prints not measured rather than borrowing its parent's figure
Honest forwardBailey-LdP deflated expectation (§9)five rows; K30-HOLD / A2-HOLD / K30-DEEP-HOLD print owed

None of the three is net of TAX, which is the holder's and is not modelled anywhere in this estate. That is stated on the board itself, not only here.

The automatic recheck

the union forward checkpoint script, fired by patearn-union-forward.timer on the 4th of Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct at 09:30 IST — first firing 2026-10-04, the day AFTER the frozen verdict day, so an open window can never be graded. It runs the frozen the union forward code, writes data/union_forward_status.json (which the library board reads and prints), and DMs the verdict.

🔴 It grades; it never promotes. A §3 pass is INPUT to the family adjudication, which graduates at most one sibling and is the desk's decision. The status artefact carries a verdict and a null graduated field by construction — there is no code path that moves a variant into the live strategy flow by itself.

Install still owed (the unit files are committed to the vps live folder, which is what makes the install systemd script --check print them as a legitimate DRIFT: reminder until installed — the README):

scp the union forward checkpoint script root@<box>:a file on the server
chmod +x a file on the server
scp scripts/systemd/vps-live/patearn-union-forward.{service,timer} root@<box>:/etc/systemd/system/
systemctl daemon-reload && systemctl enable patearn-union-forward.timer # enable ONLY — never start

Upcoming — the Union family, under review

not fundable today · 11 variants · initial checkpoint 2026-10-03

These are variants of one idea — a book that buys stocks either turning up out of an oversold patch or already showing confirmed strength. They are shown here because they exist and you should be able to see them, NOT because they are usable. None of them holds real money. The 2026-10-03 checkpoint starts the review; at least eight completed forward quarters are required before the frozen family adjudication, which graduates at most one.

9 under review · 2 rejected · 0 fundable. No union variant is fundable today, and the reason is the same for all of them: every headline is in-sample, none has a single closed forward quarter, and capacity is unverified at every size. The 2026-10-03 checkpoint is an initial review, not qualification. The frozen protocol requires at least eight completed forward quarters before adjudication and graduates at most ONE.

⚙ Hide columns
VariantWhat it addsFundabilityGross (flat cost)Net (real cost)Adjusted estimate · not forward resultsWorst drop
The Unionthe base book — RS turn ∪ RS trend, top 60 equal-weighted⏳ Not fundable — under review17.5%Measured previously; current basis unverified~15.7%−38%
Union-β14+ exclude qualifiers whose trailing-250d beta vs Nifty 500 exceeds 1.4⏳ Not fundable — under review18.1%Measured previously; current basis unverified~16.6%−28%
Union-C40RA+ rank the beta-capped qualifiers by risk-adjusted momentum and keep the top 40⏳ Not fundable — under review21.0%Measured previously; current basis unverified~18.1%−33%
A1-COMPOSITE+ an era-relative liquidity floor (raw, no clamp) + idle cash earns the risk-free rate⏳ Not fundable — under review25.6%not measuredowed−32.0% (flat basis)
A2-COMPOSITE+ the same era-relative floor, CLAMPED at ₹1cr⏳ Not fundable — under review25.5%Measured previously; current basis unverified~21.0%−33%
COMPOSITE-30+ concentrate to the top 30 and let winners run (retained names keep drifted weight, capped at 5%)⏳ Not fundable — under review26.4%+17.8%~21.6%−38%
K30-HOLD+ retain a name already owned while it stays inside the top 2× the book size⏳ Not fundable — under review27.2%+19.0%owed−38%
A2-HOLDthe equal-weight, lower-drawdown cousin — A2 (top 40) + the retention band at top 80⏳ Not fundable — under review26.6%+18.6%owed−33%
K30-DEEP-HOLD+ the deeper turn (fire only from RSI-of-RS below 20, not 30) stacked on retention⏳ Not fundable — under review27.5%+19.2%owed−29%
Union-ML (Ridge)a walk-forward learned ranker over the union's qualifiers❌ Rejected — kept on the list with its numbers20.4% vs a 20.8% control (2017+)not measurednot measurednot measured
Union-ML v2 (GBM)a shallow gradient-boosted ranker over the larger era-floor qualifier pool❌ Rejected — kept on the list with its numbers21.1% vs the hand rule's 30.1% (2017+)not measurednot measurednot measured

Read the three return columns as three different questions. Gross is what the rule earned before real trading friction — the number that flatters. Net is the same rule after brokerage, slippage and impact on a real broker's cost model. Figures are shown only where admitted to this board. Four other variants have earlier in-sample measurements whose current basis is unverified; those cells show that status. Other absent studies say not measured. Adjusted estimate discounts historical results for selection from many trials; it is neither an observed forward return nor a forecast. Four siblings have no forward figure computed yet and say owed. None of the three columns is net of TAX, which is yours and not modelled anywhere in this estate.

Automatic recheck scheduled: the frozen forward runner grades all seven sealed siblings mechanically from 2026-10-04 (quarterly thereafter), and reports the verdict here and by message. Nothing about these books changes by hand in the meantime.

Download this board (CSV) →

Each variant in full

The Union — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. The book owns strong-but-not-extreme stocks, taken either as they turn up out of an oversold relative-strength dip or once their relative strength is confirmed and persistent. The two legs fire on different names at different times (11% overlap), so the union is invested far more of the time than either leg alone. Idle capital works a Nifty Next 50 sleeve instead of sitting dead, and each name is closed on a −20% trailing stop.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Sealed pre-registered lead. No forward evidence yet; the verdict day has not arrived.

Real-cost record. An in-sample study dated 18 July 2026 measured this variant after modelled costs. That result has not been validated against the inputs and rule version used here, so no current net figure is shown.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • current-basis validation of the earlier real-cost study
  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • a capacity study — UNVERIFIED at every size

Caveats:

  • In-sample: selected after seeing 2005–2026 across ~30 configurations.
  • Every sizing fix tested (throttle, inverse-vol) was REJECTED — see the walls.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · a9a14058… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §1 →

Union-β14 — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. The union's weakest window (2012–17) was a beta problem, not a selection problem. Capping per-name beta AT SELECTION removes the highest-beta ~29% of qualifier-quarters and flips that window's alpha positive, at the cost of being invested less of the time.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Sealed pre-registered lead, awaiting the forward window.

Real-cost record. An in-sample study dated 18 July 2026 measured this variant after modelled costs. That result has not been validated against the inputs and rule version used here, so no current net figure is shown.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • current-basis validation of the earlier real-cost study
  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • a capacity study

Caveats:

  • Kill-checks recorded: the cap plateau is all-positive over 1.3–1.6 and the beta window is robust at 125d/500d, so the lever is not a single lucky knob.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · 08b46199… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §2 →

Union-C40RA — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. Once beta is capped, ranking what remains by return-per-unit-of-volatility (126d return ÷ 63d volatility) and concentrating from 60 names to 40 raises return without giving back the drawdown the cap bought.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Sealed pre-registered lead, awaiting the forward window.

Real-cost record. An in-sample study dated 18 July 2026 measured this variant after modelled costs. That result has not been validated against the inputs and rule version used here, so no current net figure is shown.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • current-basis validation of the earlier real-cost study
  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • a capacity study

Caveats:

  • Survives the honesty battery: 19.7% at 2% slip, 20.0% on next-day execution, 19.5% on the worst-honest combination — the headline is not an execution artefact.
  • Its eye-catching 30.1% is a 2017+ SLICE, not the full-period number.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · 0715a0d9… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §3 →

A1-COMPOSITE — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. A fixed ₹5cr liquidity floor is a different filter in 2006 than in 2026. Making the floor a quantile of that month's own liquidity cross-section roughly doubles the early-era qualifier pool, and parking bear-state cash at the risk-free rate stops idle capital from being a drag.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Recorded but unregistered, and dominated by A2 on every axis that matters. Visible so the family record is complete, not because it is a candidate.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • Nifty 1D Rate Index (the risk-free bear-state leg; flat 6.5%/yr before 2016-06-23)
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • registration before a forward test — it was never pre-registered
  • a real-cost (gauntlet) recut
  • a capacity study

Caveats:

  • DOMINATED by A2: equal CAGR, 3–6pp worse drawdown, half the tail liquidity, and a 2012–17 realised beta of 1.49 vs A2's 1.29.
  • Its 2013 floor dips to ₹0.37cr — the cost model is not credible at that tail.
  • Kept visible for the record; it is not a graduation candidate.

Seal: 📋 recorded · unregistered · full record: Union Ladder compendium §4 →

A2-COMPOSITE — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. A1's idea without A1's untradeable tail: the era-relative floor never falls below ₹1cr, which keeps the early-era breadth while refusing the names the cost model cannot honestly price. Same CAGR as A1 with a materially shallower worst drop.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Recorded, unregistered, and capacity-limited by construction. Not sealed, so it cannot even be graded by the forward test until the owner registers it.

Real-cost record. An in-sample study dated 18 July 2026 measured this variant after modelled costs. That result has not been validated against the inputs and rule version used here, so no current net figure is shown.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • Nifty 1D Rate Index (the risk-free bear-state leg; flat 6.5%/yr before 2016-06-23)
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • current-basis validation of the earlier real-cost study
  • registration before a forward test (it is registration-ready and needs only a sign-off)
  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • a capacity study — median pick liquidity is ₹7.7–11.3cr vs C40RA's ₹27cr

Caveats:

  • The character CHANGES here: a small/mid-cap tilt, personal-scale capital only.
  • Its 2017+ slice is the same machinery that produces C40RA's 30.1% headline — not an independent discovery.

Seal: 📋 recorded · registration-ready · full record: Union Ladder compendium §5 →

COMPOSITE-30 — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. The confirmed lead of the family. Narrowing from 40 names to 30 and letting a working position keep its drifted weight — instead of trimming it back to equal-weight every quarter — compounds the book's own winners rather than recycling into the next candidate.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — The family's designated lead — and still a sealed in-sample lead. Being the best of a set of leads is not evidence.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • Nifty 1D Rate Index (the risk-free bear-state leg; flat 6.5%/yr before 2016-06-23)
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • a capacity study
  • persisted rosters (the engine computes and discards them for its retention cousins)

Caveats:

  • Its three single-axis components each passed alone; the composite was formed by declared precedence, not by picking the best combination after the fact.
  • Worst drop under real cost is −38% — the DEEPEST of the family, and the column a reader should look at before the 26.4%.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · 07ef2ef9… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §6 →

K30-HOLD — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. Most of a quarterly book's turnover is a name crossing the rank boundary and crossing straight back. Retaining through that band cuts turnover — and therefore real cost — while mildly improving selection; drawdown is roughly unchanged.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Sealed 2026-07-22; graded for the first time at the 2026-10-03 verdict.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • Nifty 1D Rate Index (the risk-free bear-state leg; flat 6.5%/yr before 2016-06-23)
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • its deflation-adjusted forward expectation — not yet computed
  • a capacity study
  • persisted rosters — the engine discards them

Caveats:

  • Shares its base and lever with COMPOSITE-30 and its DEEP cousin, so a joint pass is ONE discovery, not three.
  • The retention lever is robust across bands 40–90 — not a single tuned band.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · e6994c19… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §6b →

A2-HOLD — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. The same turnover-cutting lever applied to the equal-weight A2 base rather than the let-winners-run base. Gives up some return for a shallower worst drop, for a reader who would rather own the smoother line.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Sealed 2026-07-22; graded for the first time at the 2026-10-03 verdict.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • Nifty 1D Rate Index (the risk-free bear-state leg; flat 6.5%/yr before 2016-06-23)
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • its deflation-adjusted forward expectation
  • a capacity study
  • persisted rosters — the engine discards them

Caveats:

  • Its net number is mildly OPTIMISTIC: equal-weight under-charges reweight drift under the gauntlet's cost model.
  • Inherits A2's small/mid-cap tilt and therefore A2's capacity ceiling.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · 17e0dd1a… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §6b →

K30-DEEP-HOLD — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. A shallower oversold reading catches more turns, and more false ones. Demanding a deeper washout raises the conviction of each turn: stronger bounces AND fewer failures, so it lifts return and cuts drawdown at the same time. Best net return and lowest worst-drop in the family.

Fundability. ⏳ Not fundable — under review — Best in-sample net AND lowest drawdown — which is exactly the profile overfitting produces, and why it is the row to trust LAST, not first.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor
  • Nifty 1D Rate Index (the risk-free bear-state leg; flat 6.5%/yr before 2016-06-23)
  • parsed ₹-per-share ex-date dividend credits (the total-return rows; a LOWER bound)

Missing before it can go live:

  • the 2026-10-03 forward verdict
  • its deflation-adjusted forward expectation
  • a capacity study
  • persisted rosters — the engine discards them

Caveats:

  • 🔴 HIGHEST overfit risk of the family — two in-sample levers stacked on one base. Disclosed in its own pre-registration.
  • Sector-relative RS only: the index-relative version was tested and FAILED.
  • The DEEP floor is robust across <25/<20, which bounds but does not remove the stacking risk.

Seal: 🔒 sealed · b705f770… · full record: Union Ladder compendium §6b →

Union-ML (Ridge) — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. an AI ranker, tested honestly: if a model can rank the union's qualifiers better than a hand-written rule, complexity earns its place.

Fundability. ❌ Rejected — kept on the list with its numbers — Falsified on held-out data. Any future ML attempt is a NEW pre-registration, not a revival of this one.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor

Missing before it can go live:

  • nothing — this one is CLOSED

Caveats:

  • It LOST to its own control on held-out data. Recorded so nobody rebuilds it.

Seal: ❌ falsified on held-out data · full record: Union Ladder compendium §7 →

Union-ML v2 (GBM) — thesis, data, what is missing

Thesis. The declared successor to the Ridge attempt, on the roughly doubled era-floor pool, with the bar raised to beat the A2 composite rather than the plain union.

Fundability. ❌ Rejected — kept on the list with its numbers — Falsified. More data and a stronger model shape did not change the verdict, which is itself the finding.

Data required (all already ingested nightly from primary exchange sources — admitting these introduces no new feed and no vendor dependency):

  • NSE bhavcopy daily OHLCV, series EQ + BE + BZ
  • corporate-action adjustments and the split-ratio quarantine
  • the 16 NSE sector indices, for point-in-time sector assignment by trailing-500d excess-correlation
  • Nifty 500 closes (regime + beta/alpha) and Nifty Next 50 closes (the idle sleeve)
  • prior-month traded value per symbol, for the liquidity floor

Missing before it can go live:

  • nothing — this one is CLOSED

Caveats:

  • Beaten by a hand-written risk-adjusted rank by ~9pp.
  • Beta was the #1 feature in all three runs — the model rediscovered the beta cap and nothing else.

Seal: ❌ falsified · full record: Union Ladder compendium §7 →

Sealed and forward-testing. Every number above is in-sample and selection-inflated. None of these books funds real money before the pre-registered 2026-10-03 initial checkpoint and at least eight completed forward quarters, and the family's frozen rule graduates at most one of them however many pass. Capacity is unverified and likely personal-scale only. Descriptive, never ranked, never advice. Canonical definition → · Full record → · What each one holds →